Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: menage a trios altec crossovers points

  1. #1
    Inactive Member MERDY's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 22nd, 2005
    Posts
    66
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    this weekend i would like to try 203b with 288g or 288c, small tatrix horn for tweeter with 808/802/or eimalar ea175 on 511 horn, bottom will be split 210 with 515b
    not sure if i will live with this but what crossover points should i go for, have n500 and marchand active 2 way , is this a really bad thing to do, altec did make quite a few 300hz horns but never a crossover
    help, plus if i look busy my wife wont ask me to do yard work

  2. #2
    Inactive Member MERDY's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 22nd, 2005
    Posts
    66
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    wowwee so much info as i typed 501 crossovers and got so much info on this on archives and ideas
    cant wait

  3. #3
    Senior Hostboard Member
    menage a trios altec crossovers points


    Old Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 23rd, 2003
    Posts
    6,351
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    60 Post(s)

    Post

    Hi.
    Altec crossovers are usually very basic units. My opinion only but I'd prefer active crossover anytime. Disclaimer- I haven't heard some of the more sophisticated passive units being built. Again just opinion I didn't care for the 203 for home use. It's a tight pattern long throw horn, I much prefer the ten or even more cell horns. We did use 203's for spot fill with the big system.

    IMHO the muticell is the best midrange horn ever made. I used them for sound reinforcement with 290's way past the time when other companies quit.

    These days I try to make the gear as compact as possible to fit on smaller trucks and use less fuel to transport. But I miss my multicells.

  4. #4
    Hostboard Member misterdwayne's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 7th, 2004
    Posts
    35
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Hi,
    I'm using 229-16L drivers matched with either, 203b, MR564 or straight without a horn.
    If I use a single order active crossover, with a ten to sixteen watt amp what do you think would be lowest safe XO that wouldn't damage the diaphragms.
    In the past my 511 horns and drivers I used an XO with about a 700 hertz f3 point, didn't seem to be a problem. That amp and XO was home brew and disassembled. I'm wanting to recreate it again for the 299's. I would build this new XO with a switch to raise/lower the f3 instead of pots.
    Thanks for any advice or stories,
    Dwayne

  5. #5
    Senior Hostboard Member LICORNE's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 23rd, 2004
    Posts
    1,603
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    3 Post(s)

    Post

    Hi,
    The 299-16 ohms from 500Hz to 15000HZ .The low frequency limit of the MRII564 is 500 HZ.

    Max power for 299-16 50 watts.

  6. #6
    Inactive Member MERDY's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 22nd, 2005
    Posts
    66
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    i have never heard a 203 with 288 which is why i would like to try,otoh would love to get a pair of mullticells if one can spare a set resonably priced some of the stuff on e pay just irks me
    cheers

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This forum has been viewed: 23747913 times.